Academic Publishing Wiki

Details for techniques?[]

Hello, if there is need for more details of black box, white box or grey box techniques, please tell me. --Erkan Yilmaz 19:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Erkan yilmaz, I am confused:
1.What do you want to explain in this paper?--Hillgentleman 03:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
that there is need to create more White box testing articles. I thought that perhaps with some more official news, I get more people gathered to do so. --Erkan Yilmaz 06:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
2.Where is the paper? I can see only a table of contents.--Hillgentleman 03:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Actually it is not much to say: just the things I mentioned in the abstract. Should then be created a paper at all? Or is this information not worth at all to present here and should be presented at a sample/results-page at the course page? --Erkan Yilmaz 06:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
If you want people to review your paper, please at least explain what the various tests are, what they are good for, and what your results are.--Hillgentleman 13:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your input Hillgentleman - I have created now a better version. Please be so kind and have a look, if it fits into the niveau of --Erkan Yilmaz 21:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)