History: Three Body Problem

23 March 2010

• curprev 14:5814:58, 23 March 2010 69.151.134.235 contribs 5,175 bytes −8 No edit summary
• curprev 14:5814:58, 23 March 2010 69.151.134.235 contribs 5,183 bytes +7 →Gravitational collapse

6 August 2009

• curprev 00:1600:16, 6 August 2009 69.150.94.137 contribs 5,176 bytes −430 Upon realizing that the gravitational fields consist an infinity of co-dependent gradient values, I say no solution embedded only finite matematical operations can define the convolution.

5 August 2009

• curprev 23:2423:24, 5 August 2009 69.150.94.137 contribs 5,606 bytes −16 →Gravitational collapse
• curprev 23:1723:17, 5 August 2009 69.150.94.137 contribs 5,622 bytes +446 →Gravitational collapse

3 December 2008

• curprev 02:0502:05, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 5,176 bytes +142 →The kinetic energy of one planet be transferred to another through gravitational means. But how?
• curprev 01:5801:58, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 5,034 bytes −18 →The kinetic energy of one planet be transferred to another through gravitational means. But how?
• curprev 01:5601:56, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 5,052 bytes +10 →Basic problem
• curprev 01:5601:56, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 5,042 bytes +10 →Intermediate problem
• curprev 01:5501:55, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 5,032 bytes −152 →The kinetic energy of one planet be transferred to another through gravitational means. But how?
• curprev 01:5401:54, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 5,184 bytes −3 →Conclusion
• curprev 01:5401:54, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 5,187 bytes +353 →The kinetic energy of one planet be transferred to another through gravitational means. But how?
• curprev 01:5001:50, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 4,834 bytes −4 →The kinetic energy of one planet be transferred to another through gravitational means. But how?
• curprev 01:4701:47, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 4,838 bytes +1 →The kinetic energy of one planet be transferred to another through gravitational means. But how?
• curprev 01:4601:46, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 4,837 bytes +3,541 No edit summary
• curprev 01:1601:16, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs m 1,296 bytes +97 No edit summary
• curprev 01:0901:09, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,199 bytes −671 No edit summary
• curprev 01:0301:03, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,870 bytes +22 →Intermediate problem
• curprev 01:0201:02, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,848 bytes +138 →Intermediate problem
• curprev 01:0101:01, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,710 bytes +61 →Intermediate problem
• curprev 00:5800:58, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,649 bytes +2 →Basic problem
• curprev 00:5800:58, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,647 bytes +6 No edit summary
• curprev 00:5700:57, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,641 bytes +10 No edit summary
• curprev 00:5600:56, 3 December 2008 Kmarinas86 talk contribs 1,631 bytes +1,631 New page: '''Gravity''' One mass accelerating toward another mass will naturally attract the other. One mass decelerating toward another mass will naturally repel the other. Gravity only deals wi...